April 22, 2026 08:10 PM
News

COPEC Proposes 50% Reduction in 'Dumsor Levy' to Ease Fuel Costs

Samuel

Apr 14, 2026 at 05:22 AM Updated: Apr 14, 2026 at 05:22 AM
COPEC proposes 50% reduction in 'dumsor levy' to ease fuel costs
  • COPEC proposes 50% reduction in Energy Sector Shortfall and Recovery Levy (ESRRL)
  • Levy reduction aims to lower fuel prices by 50% and ease household spending
  • Proposal comes amid government review of taxes and levies within petroleum price build-up

Ghana's fuel price woes may be set to ease, thanks to a proposal by the Chamber of Petroleum Consumers (COPEC) to slash the Energy Sector Shortfall and Recovery Levy (ESRRL) by 50%. The 'dumsor levy', as it's colloquially known, has been a contentious topic, with many calling for its abolition or reduction. COPEC's proposal, contained in a statement issued on Friday, April 10, forms part of the Chamber's response to the government's ongoing review of taxes and levies within the petroleum price build-up.

The proposed reduction in the levy, from GH¢1 to 50 pesewas per litre, would provide immediate relief at the pumps, effectively lowering fuel prices by the same margin. This, according to COPEC, would help cut household spending on transport and energy, while also addressing growing public concerns over the potential return of power outages.

Background: The ESRRL Conundrum

The ESRRL, widely referred to as the 'dumsor levy', was introduced in 2015 as a way to mitigate the impact of power outages on the energy sector. However, its implementation has been marred by controversy, with many arguing that it's a regressive tax that disproportionately affects low-income households. The levy has also been criticized for being opaque, with many questioning how its proceeds are utilized.

In recent months, the government has come under intense pressure to review the ESRRL, with many calling for its abolition or reduction. COPEC's proposal is seen as a compromise, one that would still generate revenue for the energy sector while providing relief to consumers.

The Proposal: A Temporary Fix?

COPEC believes that reducing the levy would strike a balance between providing relief to consumers and generating revenue for the energy sector. The Chamber argues that retaining half of the levy would still generate revenue to support the energy sector and ensure continued power generation. However, the proposal comes with trade-offs, with COPEC warning that a reduction in the levy would limit funds available for servicing energy sector debts and could slow maintenance activities if extended beyond the proposed period.

The proposal forms part of a broader set of short-term measures aimed at cushioning consumers against rising global petroleum prices. COPEC is urging policymakers to act swiftly while maintaining fiscal discipline and sector stability.

What This Means

The proposal by COPEC to reduce the ESRRL by 50% has significant implications for the energy sector and consumers alike. While the move may provide immediate relief at the pumps, it's unclear how sustainable this measure would be in the long term. The proposal highlights the need for a more comprehensive review of the ESRRL, one that would take into account the needs of both consumers and the energy sector. As the government continues to review taxes and levies within the petroleum price build-up, it's essential that policymakers prioritize fiscal discipline and sector stability.

The government's response to COPEC's proposal will be keenly watched, with many expecting a swift decision on the matter. As the energy sector continues to grapple with challenges, one thing is clear: the need for a more sustainable and equitable solution to the ESRRL conundrum.

In conclusion, the proposal by COPEC to reduce the ESRRL by 50% is a significant development in the ongoing debate over the 'dumsor levy'. While the move may provide relief to consumers, it's essential that policymakers prioritize fiscal discipline and sector stability in their response to the proposal. The energy sector's future hangs in the balance, and it's up to policymakers to ensure that the right decisions are made to secure its sustainability.

Share Article